From e517d95b63427fae9f03958dbc005c36b4ebf2cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Maydell Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:51:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: Use the mmu_idx we're passed in arm_cpu_do_unaligned_access() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit When identifying the DFSR format for an alignment fault, use the mmu index that we are passed, rather than calling cpu_mmu_index() to get the mmu index for the current CPU state. This doesn't actually make any difference since the only cases where the current MMU index differs from the index used for the load are the "unprivileged load/store" instructions, and in that case the mmu index may differ but the translation regime is the same (apart from the "use from Hyp mode" case which is UNPREDICTABLE). However it's the more logical thing to do. Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé Message-id: 1493122030-32191-2-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org --- target/arm/op_helper.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/arm/op_helper.c b/target/arm/op_helper.c index 156b825040..de2481598a 100644 --- a/target/arm/op_helper.c +++ b/target/arm/op_helper.c @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ void arm_cpu_do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, vaddr vaddr, /* the DFSR for an alignment fault depends on whether we're using * the LPAE long descriptor format, or the short descriptor format */ - if (arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format(env, cpu_mmu_index(env, false))) { + if (arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format(env, mmu_idx)) { env->exception.fsr = (1 << 9) | 0x21; } else { env->exception.fsr = 0x1; -- 2.11.4.GIT