From d7e61d6b39cd3d644bc33bcb517d24fca479704c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Leoshkevich Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:31:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tests/tcg/s390x: Test ADD LOGICAL WITH CARRY Add a test that tries different combinations of ADD LOGICAL WITH CARRY instructions. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Message-ID: <20231106093605.1349201-6-iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target | 1 + tests/tcg/s390x/add-logical-with-carry.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/add-logical-with-carry.c diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target index a476547b65..0e670f3f8b 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ TESTS+=cgebra TESTS+=clgebr TESTS+=clc TESTS+=laalg +TESTS+=add-logical-with-carry cdsg: CFLAGS+=-pthread cdsg: LDFLAGS+=-pthread diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/add-logical-with-carry.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/add-logical-with-carry.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..d982f8a651 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/add-logical-with-carry.c @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +/* + * Test ADD LOGICAL WITH CARRY instructions. + * + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later + */ +#include +#include + +static const struct test { + const char *name; + unsigned long values[3]; + unsigned long exp_sum; + int exp_cc; +} tests[] = { + /* + * Each test starts with CC 0 and executes two chained ADD LOGICAL WITH + * CARRY instructions on three input values. The values must be compatible + * with both 32- and 64-bit test functions. + */ + + /* NAME VALUES EXP_SUM EXP_CC */ + { "cc0->cc0", {0, 0, 0}, 0, 0, }, + { "cc0->cc1", {0, 0, 42}, 42, 1, }, + /* cc0->cc2 is not possible */ + /* cc0->cc3 is not possible */ + /* cc1->cc0 is not possible */ + { "cc1->cc1", {-3, 1, 1}, -1, 1, }, + { "cc1->cc2", {-3, 1, 2}, 0, 2, }, + { "cc1->cc3", {-3, 1, -1}, -3, 3, }, + /* cc2->cc0 is not possible */ + { "cc2->cc1", {-1, 1, 1}, 2, 1, }, + { "cc2->cc2", {-1, 1, -1}, 0, 2, }, + /* cc2->cc3 is not possible */ + /* cc3->cc0 is not possible */ + { "cc3->cc1", {-1, 2, 1}, 3, 1, }, + { "cc3->cc2", {-1, 2, -2}, 0, 2, }, + { "cc3->cc3", {-1, 2, -1}, 1, 3, }, +}; + +/* Test ALCR (register variant) followed by ALC (memory variant). */ +static unsigned long test32rm(unsigned long a, unsigned long b, + unsigned long c, int *cc) +{ + unsigned int a32 = a, b32 = b, c32 = c; + + asm("xr %[cc],%[cc]\n" + "alcr %[a],%[b]\n" + "alc %[a],%[c]\n" + "ipm %[cc]" + : [a] "+&r" (a32), [cc] "+&r" (*cc) + : [b] "r" (b32), [c] "T" (c32) + : "cc"); + *cc >>= 28; + + return (int)a32; +} + +/* Test ALC (memory variant) followed by ALCR (register variant). */ +static unsigned long test32mr(unsigned long a, unsigned long b, + unsigned long c, int *cc) +{ + unsigned int a32 = a, b32 = b, c32 = c; + + asm("xr %[cc],%[cc]\n" + "alc %[a],%[b]\n" + "alcr %[c],%[a]\n" + "ipm %[cc]" + : [a] "+&r" (a32), [c] "+&r" (c32), [cc] "+&r" (*cc) + : [b] "T" (b32) + : "cc"); + *cc >>= 28; + + return (int)c32; +} + +/* Test ALCGR (register variant) followed by ALCG (memory variant). */ +static unsigned long test64rm(unsigned long a, unsigned long b, + unsigned long c, int *cc) +{ + asm("xr %[cc],%[cc]\n" + "alcgr %[a],%[b]\n" + "alcg %[a],%[c]\n" + "ipm %[cc]" + : [a] "+&r" (a), [cc] "+&r" (*cc) + : [b] "r" (b), [c] "T" (c) + : "cc"); + *cc >>= 28; + return a; +} + +/* Test ALCG (memory variant) followed by ALCGR (register variant). */ +static unsigned long test64mr(unsigned long a, unsigned long b, + unsigned long c, int *cc) +{ + asm("xr %[cc],%[cc]\n" + "alcg %[a],%[b]\n" + "alcgr %[c],%[a]\n" + "ipm %[cc]" + : [a] "+&r" (a), [c] "+&r" (c), [cc] "+&r" (*cc) + : [b] "T" (b) + : "cc"); + *cc >>= 28; + return c; +} + +static const struct test_func { + const char *name; + unsigned long (*ptr)(unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long, int *); +} test_funcs[] = { + { "test32rm", test32rm }, + { "test32mr", test32mr }, + { "test64rm", test64rm }, + { "test64mr", test64mr }, +}; + +static const struct test_perm { + const char *name; + size_t a_idx, b_idx, c_idx; +} test_perms[] = { + { "a, b, c", 0, 1, 2 }, + { "b, a, c", 1, 0, 2 }, +}; + +int main(void) +{ + unsigned long a, b, c, sum; + int result = EXIT_SUCCESS; + const struct test_func *f; + const struct test_perm *p; + size_t i, j, k; + const struct test *t; + int cc; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(tests) / sizeof(tests[0]); i++) { + t = &tests[i]; + for (j = 0; j < sizeof(test_funcs) / sizeof(test_funcs[0]); j++) { + f = &test_funcs[j]; + for (k = 0; k < sizeof(test_perms) / sizeof(test_perms[0]); k++) { + p = &test_perms[k]; + a = t->values[p->a_idx]; + b = t->values[p->b_idx]; + c = t->values[p->c_idx]; + sum = f->ptr(a, b, c, &cc); + if (sum != t->exp_sum || cc != t->exp_cc) { + fprintf(stderr, + "[ FAILED ] %s %s(0x%lx, 0x%lx, 0x%lx) returned 0x%lx cc %d, expected 0x%lx cc %d\n", + t->name, f->name, a, b, c, sum, cc, + t->exp_sum, t->exp_cc); + result = EXIT_FAILURE; + } + } + } + } + + return result; +} -- 2.11.4.GIT