| commit | 9d3524b39e1fe5f3bb7a990ad7841e469e954a3b | |
| author | Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> | |
| Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:39:25 +0000 (16 16:39 -0700) | ||
| committer | Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> | |
| Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:08:56 +0000 (19 11:08 +0100) | ||
| tree | 69b1e62876d7f4d04a831c7b0634f1912ca23640 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | dd5e38b19d7cb07d317e1285941d8245c01da540 | commitdiff |
qapi-visit: Honor prefix of discriminator enum
When we added support for a user-specified prefix for an enum
type (commit 351d36e), we forgot to teach the qapi-visit code
to honor that prefix in the case of using a prefixed enum as
the discriminator for a flat union. While there is still some
on-list debate on whether we want to keep prefixes, we should
at least make it work as long as it is still part of the code
base.
Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1455665965-27638-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
When we added support for a user-specified prefix for an enum
type (commit 351d36e), we forgot to teach the qapi-visit code
to honor that prefix in the case of using a prefixed enum as
the discriminator for a flat union. While there is still some
on-list debate on whether we want to keep prefixes, we should
at least make it work as long as it is still part of the code
base.
Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1455665965-27638-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
| scripts/qapi-visit.py | diffblobblamehistory | |
| tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json | diffblobblamehistory | |
| tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out | diffblobblamehistory |