| commit | 040425f849b959ed903610cc028e0996d921f9ca | |
| author | Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> | |
| Fri, 3 Apr 2020 19:11:39 +0000 (3 20:11 +0100) | ||
| committer | Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> | |
| Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:19:49 +0000 (7 16:19 +0100) | ||
| tree | abcb701fda090377cdbec99860ff077e81e0596e | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 20a4f14f6e6f543100bfdd93705cbdebb549d250 | commitdiff |
elf-ops: bail out if we have no function symbols
It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
While we are at it lets drop the unchecked return value and cleanup
the fail leg by use of g_autoptr.
Another fix was proposed 101 weeks ago in:
Message-Id: 20180421232120.22208-1-f4bug@amsat.org
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200403191150.863-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
It's perfectly possible to have no function symbols in your elf file
and if we do the undefined behaviour sanitizer rightly complains about
us passing NULL to qsort. Check nsyms before we go ahead.
While we are at it lets drop the unchecked return value and cleanup
the fail leg by use of g_autoptr.
Another fix was proposed 101 weeks ago in:
Message-Id: 20180421232120.22208-1-f4bug@amsat.org
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200403191150.863-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
| include/hw/elf_ops.h | diffblobblamehistory |