From 6d74aae780139db9bb37a7072c78d163b78e6f45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Baudis Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:05:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] UCT dynkomi_interval: 500 -> 250, remove comment on #sims adjustment It seems that there is no correlation between thinking time and best dynkomi interval length. --- uct/uct.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/uct/uct.c b/uct/uct.c index 3cf637a..e1a84a0 100644 --- a/uct/uct.c +++ b/uct/uct.c @@ -488,9 +488,7 @@ uct_state_init(char *arg, struct board *b) u->best2_ratio = 2.5; u->val_scale = 0.04; u->val_points = 40; - /* TODO: Adjust this by number of simulations - it's more important how - * many times per move we do the adjustment. */ - u->dynkomi_interval = 500; + u->dynkomi_interval = 250; u->tenuki_d = 4; u->local_tree_aging = 2; -- 2.11.4.GIT