From cc9f5108bc0e206612961f241ae203c841b6337f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rsandifo Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:19:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [63/77] Simplifications after type switch This patch makes a few simplifications after the previous mechanical machine_mode->scalar_int_mode change. 2017-08-30 Richard Sandiford Alan Hayward David Sherwood gcc/ * expmed.c (extract_high_half): Use scalar_int_mode and remove assertion. (expmed_mult_highpart_optab): Likewise. (expmed_mult_highpart): Likewise. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@251514 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 --- gcc/ChangeLog | 9 +++++++++ gcc/expmed.c | 12 +++--------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index d7ee5c29afa..0ddf5d9f851 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -2,6 +2,15 @@ Alan Hayward David Sherwood + * expmed.c (extract_high_half): Use scalar_int_mode and remove + assertion. + (expmed_mult_highpart_optab): Likewise. + (expmed_mult_highpart): Likewise. + +2017-08-30 Richard Sandiford + Alan Hayward + David Sherwood + * builtins.h (builtin_strncpy_read_str): Take a scalar_int_mode instead of a machine_mode. (builtin_memset_read_str): Likewise. diff --git a/gcc/expmed.c b/gcc/expmed.c index 5873df42383..10cf59c5c2e 100644 --- a/gcc/expmed.c +++ b/gcc/expmed.c @@ -3672,14 +3672,11 @@ expand_mult_highpart_adjust (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx adj_operand, rtx op0, static rtx extract_high_half (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op) { - machine_mode wider_mode; - if (mode == word_mode) return gen_highpart (mode, op); - gcc_assert (!SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode)); + scalar_int_mode wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode).require (); - wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode).require (); op = expand_shift (RSHIFT_EXPR, wider_mode, op, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode), 0, 1); return convert_modes (mode, wider_mode, op, 0); @@ -3693,15 +3690,13 @@ expmed_mult_highpart_optab (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx target, int unsignedp, int max_cost) { rtx narrow_op1 = gen_int_mode (INTVAL (op1), mode); - machine_mode wider_mode; optab moptab; rtx tem; int size; bool speed = optimize_insn_for_speed_p (); - gcc_assert (!SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode)); + scalar_int_mode wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode).require (); - wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode).require (); size = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode); /* Firstly, try using a multiplication insn that only generates the needed @@ -3807,7 +3802,6 @@ static rtx expmed_mult_highpart (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx target, int unsignedp, int max_cost) { - machine_mode wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode).require (); unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT cnst1; int extra_cost; bool sign_adjust = false; @@ -3816,7 +3810,6 @@ expmed_mult_highpart (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx tem; bool speed = optimize_insn_for_speed_p (); - gcc_assert (!SCALAR_FLOAT_MODE_P (mode)); /* We can't support modes wider than HOST_BITS_PER_INT. */ gcc_assert (HWI_COMPUTABLE_MODE_P (mode)); @@ -3826,6 +3819,7 @@ expmed_mult_highpart (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0, rtx op1, ??? We might be able to perform double-word arithmetic if mode == word_mode, however all the cost calculations in synth_mult etc. assume single-word operations. */ + scalar_int_mode wider_mode = GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE (mode).require (); if (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (wider_mode) > BITS_PER_WORD) return expmed_mult_highpart_optab (mode, op0, op1, target, unsignedp, max_cost); -- 2.11.4.GIT