[Ada] Fix check for looking for user defined literals
commitf1231d9a0baab25e0a07b0d6146b91e59ecfadb8
authorEd Schonberg <schonberg@adacore.com>
Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:44:16 +0000 (14 15:44 +0100)
committerPierre-Marie de Rodat <derodat@adacore.com>
Mon, 9 May 2022 09:27:33 +0000 (9 09:27 +0000)
tree98c46cf63b1868891eadb818c92566203d3e7ac5
parent28fffc452eedb284d047b83adc7f8772b15bb0f8
[Ada] Fix check for looking for user defined literals

Recall that Has_Possible_Literal_Aspects only comes in if a given node
does not have any visible interpretation. If one operand is a literal we
assume that there may be a user-defined literal defined for some type to
be determined during the downward pass of resolution, but that depends
on the existence of some user-defined function or operator that can take
that literal as an actual. If analysis did not find such, the call is
illegal. I think that the following must be added to Operator_Check to
recover the proper error.

Note that this breaks current partial implementation of user-defined
literals.

gcc/ada/

* sem_ch4.adb (Operator_Check): Fix condition.
gcc/ada/sem_ch4.adb