| commit | 811449496b3e3caa9a8cf43feacbade0153324f2 | |
| author | Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> | |
| Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:18:33 +0000 (4 09:18 -0500) | ||
| committer | Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> | |
| Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:18:33 +0000 (4 09:18 -0500) | ||
| tree | b5d5afe2d629b3cf19f27d19445ad9998c6c3b1a | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 8c087b5183adab186a298f2d6ed39aefdcae413c | commitdiff |
Btrfs: join the transaction in __btrfs_setxattr
With selinux on we end up calling __btrfs_setxattr when we create an inode,
which calls btrfs_start_transaction(). The problem is we've already called
that in btrfs_new_inode, and in btrfs_start_transaction we end up doing a
wait_current_trans(). If btrfs-transaction has started committing it will wait
for all handles to finish, while the other process is waiting for the
transaction to commit. This is fixed by using btrfs_join_transaction, which
won't wait for the transaction to commit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
With selinux on we end up calling __btrfs_setxattr when we create an inode,
which calls btrfs_start_transaction(). The problem is we've already called
that in btrfs_new_inode, and in btrfs_start_transaction we end up doing a
wait_current_trans(). If btrfs-transaction has started committing it will wait
for all handles to finish, while the other process is waiting for the
transaction to commit. This is fixed by using btrfs_join_transaction, which
won't wait for the transaction to commit. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
| fs/btrfs/xattr.c | diffblobblamehistory |