From 964f664520a4c6a247e2c9ff8b4481631cf746df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:28:19 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add a rmb() in IH processing We should have a read memory barrier between reading the WPTR from memory and reading ring entries based on that value (ie, we need to ensure both loads are done in order by the CPU). It could be argued that the MMIO reads in r600_ack_irq() might be enough to get that barrier but I prefer keeping an explicit one just in case. [airlied: fix evergreen + r/w mixup] Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Reviewed-by: Matt Turner Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 3 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c index 37dd6449f46..bcd55917c7c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c @@ -2759,6 +2759,9 @@ int evergreen_irq_process(struct radeon_device *rdev) return IRQ_NONE; } restart_ih: + /* Order reading of wptr vs. reading of IH ring data */ + rmb(); + /* display interrupts */ evergreen_irq_ack(rdev); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c index f56e6557983..aa5571b73aa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c @@ -3318,6 +3318,9 @@ int r600_irq_process(struct radeon_device *rdev) } restart_ih: + /* Order reading of wptr vs. reading of IH ring data */ + rmb(); + /* display interrupts */ r600_irq_ack(rdev); -- 2.11.4.GIT