From 3d76c082907e8f83c5d5c4572f38d53ad8f00c4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:46:32 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Clean up code based on review feedback from Josh Triplett, part 3 Whitespace fixes, updated comments, and trivial code movement. o Fix whitespace error in RCU_HEAD_INIT() o Move "So where is rcu_write_lock()" comment so that it does not come between the rcu_read_unlock() header comment and the rcu_read_unlock() definition. o Move the module_param statements for blimit, qhimark, and qlowmark to immediately follow the corresponding definitions. o In __rcu_offline_cpu(), move the assignment to rdp_me inside the "if" statement, given that rdp_me is not used outside of that "if" statement. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: dhowells@redhat.com LKML-Reference: <12541491931164-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 14 +++++++------- kernel/rcutree.c | 10 +++++----- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 70331218e4b..3ebd0b7bcb0 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ extern int rcu_scheduler_active; #error "Unknown RCU implementation specified to kernel configuration" #endif -#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL } +#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL } #define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT #define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \ (ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \ @@ -129,12 +129,6 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void) rcu_read_acquire(); } -/** - * rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section. - * - * See rcu_read_lock() for more information. - */ - /* * So where is rcu_write_lock()? It does not exist, as there is no * way for writers to lock out RCU readers. This is a feature, not @@ -144,6 +138,12 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void) * used as well. RCU does not care how the writers keep out of each * others' way, as long as they do so. */ + +/** + * rcu_read_unlock - marks the end of an RCU read-side critical section. + * + * See rcu_read_lock() for more information. + */ static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void) { rcu_read_release(); diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 81af59b8dd8..d5597830faf 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ static int blimit = 10; /* Maximum callbacks per softirq. */ static int qhimark = 10000; /* If this many pending, ignore blimit. */ static int qlowmark = 100; /* Once only this many pending, use blimit. */ +module_param(blimit, int, 0); +module_param(qhimark, int, 0); +module_param(qlowmark, int, 0); + static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed); static int rcu_pending(int cpu); @@ -878,8 +882,8 @@ static void __rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) * indefinitely delay callbacks, you have far worse things to * be worrying about. */ - rdp_me = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()]; if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) { + rdp_me = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()]; *rdp_me->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rdp->nxtlist; rdp_me->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]; rdp->nxtlist = NULL; @@ -1575,7 +1579,3 @@ void __init __rcu_init(void) } #include "rcutree_plugin.h" - -module_param(blimit, int, 0); -module_param(qhimark, int, 0); -module_param(qlowmark, int, 0); -- 2.11.4.GIT