| commit | 53fecd8ae1900fb571086f54f664051004665b55 | |
| author | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | |
| Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:41:20 +0000 (27 13:41 +0200) | ||
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | |
| Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:31:33 +0000 (27 14:31 +0200) | ||
| tree | 2dfd5aba9d974f0f114e96cbdc2aef82a32078a9 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 4d8d595dfa69e1c807bf928f364668a7f30da5dc | commitdiff |
sched: kill task_group balancing
The idea was to balance groups until we've reached the global goal, however
Vatsa rightly pointed out that we might never reach that goal this way -
hence take out this logic.
[ the initial rationale for this 'feature' was to promote max concurrency
within a group - it does not however affect fairness ]
Reported-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
The idea was to balance groups until we've reached the global goal, however
Vatsa rightly pointed out that we might never reach that goal this way -
hence take out this logic.
[ the initial rationale for this 'feature' was to promote max concurrency
within a group - it does not however affect fairness ]
Reported-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| kernel/sched_fair.c | diffblobblamehistory |