From 04b361abfdc522239e3a071f3afdebf5787d9f03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 12:36:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] i386: Execute stack overflow warning on interrupt stack v2 Previously the reporting printk would run on the process stack, which risks overflow an already low stack. Instead execute it on the interrupt stack. This makes it more likely for the printk to make it actually out. It adds one not taken test/branch more to the interrupt path when stack overflow checking is enabled. We could avoid that by duplicating more code, but that seemed not worth it. Based on an observation by Eric Sandeen. v2: Fix warnings in some configs Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Cc: mingo@elte.hu Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c index 147352df28b..3f76561da81 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c @@ -61,6 +61,26 @@ static union irq_ctx *hardirq_ctx[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly; static union irq_ctx *softirq_ctx[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly; #endif +static void stack_overflow(void) +{ + printk("low stack detected by irq handler\n"); + dump_stack(); +} + +static inline void call_on_stack2(void *func, void *stack, + unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2) +{ + unsigned long bx; + asm volatile( + " xchgl %%ebx,%%esp \n" + " call *%%edi \n" + " movl %%ebx,%%esp \n" + : "=a" (arg1), "=d" (arg2), "=b" (bx) + : "0" (arg1), "1" (arg2), "2" (stack), + "D" (func) + : "memory", "cc", "ecx"); +} + /* * do_IRQ handles all normal device IRQ's (the special * SMP cross-CPU interrupts have their own specific @@ -76,6 +96,7 @@ unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) union irq_ctx *curctx, *irqctx; u32 *isp; #endif + int overflow = 0; if (unlikely((unsigned)irq >= NR_IRQS)) { printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: cannot handle IRQ %d\n", @@ -92,11 +113,8 @@ unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) __asm__ __volatile__("andl %%esp,%0" : "=r" (sp) : "0" (THREAD_SIZE - 1)); - if (unlikely(sp < (sizeof(struct thread_info) + STACK_WARN))) { - printk("do_IRQ: stack overflow: %ld\n", - sp - sizeof(struct thread_info)); - dump_stack(); - } + if (unlikely(sp < (sizeof(struct thread_info) + STACK_WARN))) + overflow = 1; } #endif @@ -112,8 +130,6 @@ unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) * current stack (which is the irq stack already after all) */ if (curctx != irqctx) { - int arg1, arg2, bx; - /* build the stack frame on the IRQ stack */ isp = (u32*) ((char*)irqctx + sizeof(*irqctx)); irqctx->tinfo.task = curctx->tinfo.task; @@ -127,18 +143,19 @@ unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs) (irqctx->tinfo.preempt_count & ~SOFTIRQ_MASK) | (curctx->tinfo.preempt_count & SOFTIRQ_MASK); - asm volatile( - " xchgl %%ebx,%%esp \n" - " call *%%edi \n" - " movl %%ebx,%%esp \n" - : "=a" (arg1), "=d" (arg2), "=b" (bx) - : "0" (irq), "1" (desc), "2" (isp), - "D" (desc->handle_irq) - : "memory", "cc", "ecx" - ); + /* Execute warning on interrupt stack */ + if (unlikely(overflow)) + call_on_stack2(stack_overflow, isp, 0, 0); + + call_on_stack2(desc->handle_irq, isp, irq, (unsigned long)desc); } else #endif + { + /* AK: Slightly bogus here */ + if (overflow) + stack_overflow(); desc->handle_irq(irq, desc); + } irq_exit(); set_irq_regs(old_regs); -- 2.11.4.GIT