| commit | 848369926693778cd0f31bfca7fb951164715b4f | |
| author | Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk> | |
| Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:52:20 +0000 (2 16:52 +0000) | ||
| committer | Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> | |
| Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:21:34 +0000 (13 19:21 +0100) | ||
| tree | 33b07b0537fc275ec2eada68c6902219966dfbee | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 38a684963f619eb9117cb898b92bde92cdd09127 | commitdiff |
mfd: Allow the board to choose any GPIO base for tps65010
If the board does not care where the TPS turns up, then specifiying the
value -1 to get gpiolib to dynamically allocate the base for the chip
is valid.
Change the test to look for != 0, so that any boards specifying zero
will not end up with gpio that they didn't want.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Simtec Liunx Team <linux@simtec.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
If the board does not care where the TPS turns up, then specifiying the
value -1 to get gpiolib to dynamically allocate the base for the chip
is valid.
Change the test to look for != 0, so that any boards specifying zero
will not end up with gpio that they didn't want.
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben@simtec.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Simtec Liunx Team <linux@simtec.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
| drivers/mfd/tps65010.c | diffblobblamehistory |