| commit | c636b572e00e38855dc7a56a0fa438dd835f39de | |
| author | Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> | |
| Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:45:56 +0000 (6 13:45 +0400) | ||
| committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | |
| Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:48:16 +0000 (19 10:48 -0400) | ||
| tree | cd0ce34e01030e61cc0571234b21e0af71e714ff | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | f10fef38d2d1605c977346457d0adb0919d0bbe7 | commitdiff |
sunrpc: Don't return NULL from rpcb_create
> The reason for this is in the future, we may want to support additional
> address family types. We should, therefore, ensure that every piece of
> code that is sensitive to address families fail in some orderly manner
> to let developers know where a change is needed.
Makes sense. I was under impression, that AF-s other than INET are not
cared about at all :(
Here's a fixed version of the patch.
Log:
Its callers check for ERR_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
> The reason for this is in the future, we may want to support additional
> address family types. We should, therefore, ensure that every piece of
> code that is sensitive to address families fail in some orderly manner
> to let developers know where a change is needed.
Makes sense. I was under impression, that AF-s other than INET are not
cared about at all :(
Here's a fixed version of the patch.
Log:
Its callers check for ERR_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
| net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c | diffblobblamehistory |