| commit | 7c59aec830c7ed6c745bd513982cee3563ed20c1 | |
| author | KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> | |
| Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:19:33 +0000 (9 17:19 -0700) | ||
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | |
| Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:45:00 +0000 (9 20:45 -0700) | ||
| tree | f06d2c626d0ab0ff2f9880d98a50e60be4af7816 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 1489fa14cb757b496c8fa2b63097dbcee6690695 | commitdiff |
oom: don't try to kill oom_unkillable child
Presently, badness() doesn't care about either CPUSET nor mempolicy. Then
if the victim child process have disjoint nodemask, OOM Killer might kill
innocent process.
This patch fixes it.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Presently, badness() doesn't care about either CPUSET nor mempolicy. Then
if the victim child process have disjoint nodemask, OOM Killer might kill
innocent process.
This patch fixes it.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| mm/oom_kill.c | diffblobblamehistory |