| commit | e4a02b4a951a7adf9d982b11c64686570c29fbe7 | |
| author | Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com> | |
| Tue, 6 Dec 2011 00:10:31 +0000 (6 01:10 +0100) | ||
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | |
| Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:03:37 +0000 (6 07:03 +0100) | ||
| tree | c4b4baf74cd80bd8caa230fc25bf79c10ed728c6 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 44b111b519160e33fdc41eadb39af86a24707edf | commitdiff |
x86: Fix the !CONFIG_NUMA build of the new CPU ID fixup code support
I used "ifdef CONFIG_NUMA" simply because it doesn't make
sense in a non-numa configuration even with SMP enabled.
Besides, the only place where it is called right now is
in kernel/cpu/amd.c:srat_detect_node() within the
"CONFIG_NUMA" protected part.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323073238-32686-2-git-send-email-daniel@numascale-asia.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
I used "ifdef CONFIG_NUMA" simply because it doesn't make
sense in a non-numa configuration even with SMP enabled.
Besides, the only place where it is called right now is
in kernel/cpu/amd.c:srat_detect_node() within the
"CONFIG_NUMA" protected part.
Signed-off-by: Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1323073238-32686-2-git-send-email-daniel@numascale-asia.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | diffblobblamehistory |