| commit | 0aa1e0143d30378a5f616b3774c327e94e5489eb | |
| author | bsimmers <bsimmers@fb.com> | |
| Tue, 27 May 2014 23:49:30 +0000 (27 16:49 -0700) | ||
| committer | JoelMarcey <joelm@fb.com> | |
| Fri, 30 May 2014 05:49:53 +0000 (29 22:49 -0700) | ||
| tree | 7a7ed66f437f87b3108107fa29f47d000ad6cd6b | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 209fd8e933d6e1629444bacd9016c45767b52b41 | commitdiff |
Don't duplicate the dispatch loop just for RetC profiling
Summary: For the interpreter-based warmup profiling, we just call
shouldProfile() in each bytecode's implementation. I see no reason why RetC
should be any different.
Reviewed By: @edwinsmith
Differential Revision: D1350436
Summary: For the interpreter-based warmup profiling, we just call
shouldProfile() in each bytecode's implementation. I see no reason why RetC
should be any different.
Reviewed By: @edwinsmith
Differential Revision: D1350436
| hphp/runtime/base/execution-context.h | diffblobblamehistory | |
| hphp/runtime/vm/bytecode.cpp | diffblobblamehistory |