| commit | a024ce3642392908ff4794069cd99d9316f6bd45 | |
| author | Roland Schulz <roland.schulz@intel.com> | |
| Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:13:16 +0000 (12 17:13 -0700) | ||
| committer | Roland Schulz <roland.schulz@intel.com> | |
| Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:37:00 +0000 (13 18:37 +0200) | ||
| tree | 3cdaed0c94b12f1609eefc4e5f032159688a6e4f | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | cc9b3962fafc2facc4cf95de2aae39e4b65e868c | commitdiff |
Remove cppcheck
cppcheck gives false positives with modern C++ constructs. It's
parser isn't very robust. Most of its tests are covered by at
least one of clang-tidy/clang/clang-analyzer/gcc/msvc/msvc-analazer
which all are significantly more robost making the ratio of
false positives to real issues identified not worth it. Additionally
updating cppcheck to the lastest version isn't possible because
it fails with syntax error in gtest.
Change-Id: I290468947c46eb5f4901b7cc30cdf96e487a50cf
cppcheck gives false positives with modern C++ constructs. It's
parser isn't very robust. Most of its tests are covered by at
least one of clang-tidy/clang/clang-analyzer/gcc/msvc/msvc-analazer
which all are significantly more robost making the ratio of
false positives to real issues identified not worth it. Additionally
updating cppcheck to the lastest version isn't possible because
it fails with syntax error in gtest.
Change-Id: I290468947c46eb5f4901b7cc30cdf96e487a50cf
50 files changed: