From 591ddf73bd53202cfbb5db6567c9ff24c46677e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Baudis Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:58:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tex: Sort player style table by year --- tex/gostyle.tex | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/tex/gostyle.tex b/tex/gostyle.tex index b5525bc..1190b15 100644 --- a/tex/gostyle.tex +++ b/tex/gostyle.tex @@ -765,8 +765,10 @@ attempt to use our classifiers to transform pattern vector $\vec p$ to style vec The source game collection is GoGoD Winter 2008 \cite{GoGoD} containing 55000 professional games, dating from the early Go history 1500 years ago to the present. We consider only games of a small subset of players (fig. \ref{fig:style_marks}); -we have chosen these for being well-known within the players community and -having large number of played games in our collection. +we have chosen these for being well-known within the players community, +having large number of played games in our collection and not playing too long +ago.\footnote{Over time, many commonly used sequences get altered, adopted and +dismissed; usual playing conditions can also differ significantly.} \subsection{Expert-based knowledge} \label{style-vectors} @@ -814,7 +816,7 @@ The complete list of answers is in table \ref{fig:style_marks}. % increase table row spacing, adjust to taste \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3} \begin{threeparttable} -\caption{Expert-Based Style Aspects of Selected Professionals\tnote{1}} +\caption{Expert-Based Style Aspects of Selected Professionals\tnote{1} \tnote{2}} \label{fig:style_marks} \centering % Some packages, such as MDW tools, offer better commands for making tables @@ -823,37 +825,38 @@ The complete list of answers is in table \ref{fig:style_marks}. \hline Player & $\tau$ & $\omega$ & $\alpha$ & $\theta$ \\ \hline -Yoda Norimoto & $6.3 \pm 1.7$ & $4.3 \pm 2.1$ & $4.3 \pm 2.1$ & $3.3 \pm 1.2$ \\ -Yi Se-tol & $5.3 \pm 0.5$ & $6.6 \pm 2.5$ & $9.3 \pm 0.5$ & $6.6 \pm 1.2$ \\ -Yi Ch'ang-ho\tnote{2}& $7.0 \pm 0.8$ & $5.0 \pm 1.4$ & $2.6 \pm 0.9$ & $2.6 \pm 1.2$ \\ -Takemiya Masaki & $1.3 \pm 0.5$ & $6.3 \pm 2.1$ & $7.0 \pm 0.8$ & $1.3 \pm 0.5$ \\ +Go Seigen\tnote{3} & $6.0 \pm 2.0$ & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $8.0 \pm 1.0$ & $5.0 \pm 1.0$ \\ +Ishida Yoshio\tnote{4}&$8.0 \pm 1.4$ & $5.0 \pm 1.4$ & $3.3 \pm 1.2$ & $5.3 \pm 0.5$ \\ +Miyazawa Goro & $1.5 \pm 0.5$ & $10 \pm 0 $ & $9.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.0 \pm 1.0$ \\ +Yi Ch'ang-ho\tnote{5}& $7.0 \pm 0.8$ & $5.0 \pm 1.4$ & $2.6 \pm 0.9$ & $2.6 \pm 1.2$ \\ Sakata Eio & $7.6 \pm 1.7$ & $4.6 \pm 0.5$ & $7.3 \pm 0.9$ & $8.0 \pm 1.6$ \\ -Rui Naiwei & $4.6 \pm 1.2$ & $5.6 \pm 0.5$ & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ & $3.3 \pm 1.2$ \\ +Fujisawa Hideyuki & $3.5 \pm 0.5$ & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $7.0 \pm 0.0$ & $4.0 \pm 0.0$ \\ Otake Hideo & $4.3 \pm 0.5$ & $3.0 \pm 0.0$ & $4.6 \pm 1.2$ & $3.6 \pm 0.9$ \\ -O Meien & $2.6 \pm 1.2$ & $9.6 \pm 0.5$ & $8.3 \pm 1.7$ & $3.6 \pm 1.2$ \\ +Kato Masao & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.5 \pm 1.5$ & $9.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.0 \pm 0.0$ \\ +Takemiya Masaki & $1.3 \pm 0.5$ & $6.3 \pm 2.1$ & $7.0 \pm 0.8$ & $1.3 \pm 0.5$ \\ +Kobayashi Koichi & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $5.5 \pm 0.5$ \\ +Cho Chikun & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ & $7.6 \pm 0.9$ & $6.6 \pm 1.2$ & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ \\ Ma Xiaochun & $8.0 \pm 2.2$ & $6.3 \pm 0.5$ & $5.6 \pm 1.9$ & $8.0 \pm 0.8$ \\ +Yoda Norimoto & $6.3 \pm 1.7$ & $4.3 \pm 2.1$ & $4.3 \pm 2.1$ & $3.3 \pm 1.2$ \\ Luo Xihe & $7.3 \pm 0.9$ & $7.3 \pm 2.5$ & $7.6 \pm 0.9$ & $6.0 \pm 1.4$ \\ -Ishida Yoshio\tnote{3}&$8.0 \pm 1.4$ & $5.0 \pm 1.4$ & $3.3 \pm 1.2$ & $5.3 \pm 0.5$ \\ -Gu Li & $5.6 \pm 0.9$ & $7.0 \pm 0.8$ & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ & $4.0 \pm 0.8$ \\ -Cho U & $7.3 \pm 2.4$ & $6.0 \pm 0.8$ & $5.3 \pm 1.7$ & $6.3 \pm 1.7$ \\ -Cho Chikun & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ & $7.6 \pm 0.9$ & $6.6 \pm 1.2$ & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ \\ +O Meien & $2.6 \pm 1.2$ & $9.6 \pm 0.5$ & $8.3 \pm 1.7$ & $3.6 \pm 1.2$ \\ +Rui Naiwei & $4.6 \pm 1.2$ & $5.6 \pm 0.5$ & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ & $3.3 \pm 1.2$ \\ Yuki Satoshi & $3.0 \pm 1.0$ & $8.5 \pm 0.5$ & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $4.5 \pm 0.5$ \\ -Yamashita Keigo\tnote{3}&$2.0\pm 0.0$& $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $9.5 \pm 0.5$ & $3.0 \pm 1.0$ \\ -Takao Shinji & $5.0 \pm 1.0$ & $3.5 \pm 0.5$ & $5.5 \pm 1.5$ & $4.5 \pm 0.5$ \\ -Miyazawa Goro & $1.5 \pm 0.5$ & $10 \pm 0 $ & $9.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.0 \pm 1.0$ \\ -Kobayashi Koichi & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $5.5 \pm 0.5$ \\ -Kato Masao & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.5 \pm 1.5$ & $9.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.0 \pm 0.0$ \\ Hane Naoki & $7.5 \pm 0.5$ & $2.5 \pm 0.5$ & $4.0 \pm 0.0$ & $4.5 \pm 1.5$ \\ -Go Seigen\tnote{4} & $6.0 \pm 2.0$ & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $8.0 \pm 1.0$ & $5.0 \pm 1.0$ \\ -Fujisawa Hideyuki & $3.5 \pm 0.5$ & $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $7.0 \pm 0.0$ & $4.0 \pm 0.0$ \\ +Takao Shinji & $5.0 \pm 1.0$ & $3.5 \pm 0.5$ & $5.5 \pm 1.5$ & $4.5 \pm 0.5$ \\ +Yi Se-tol & $5.3 \pm 0.5$ & $6.6 \pm 2.5$ & $9.3 \pm 0.5$ & $6.6 \pm 1.2$ \\ +Yamashita Keigo\tnote{4}&$2.0\pm 0.0$& $9.0 \pm 1.0$ & $9.5 \pm 0.5$ & $3.0 \pm 1.0$ \\ +Cho U & $7.3 \pm 2.4$ & $6.0 \pm 0.8$ & $5.3 \pm 1.7$ & $6.3 \pm 1.7$ \\ +Gu Li & $5.6 \pm 0.9$ & $7.0 \pm 0.8$ & $9.0 \pm 0.8$ & $4.0 \pm 0.8$ \\ Chen Yaoye & $6.0 \pm 1.0$ & $4.0 \pm 1.0$ & $6.0 \pm 1.0$ & $5.5 \pm 0.5$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \begin{tablenotes} \item [1] Including standard deviation. Only players where we got at least two out of tree answers are included. -\item [2] We consider games only up to year 2004, since Yi Ch'ang-ho was prominent representative of a balanced, careful player until then, but is regarded to have altered his style significantly afterwards. -\item [3] We do not consider games of Ishida Yoshio and Yamashita Keigo for the PCA analysis since they are significant outliers, making high-order dimensions much like purely ``similarity to this player''. Takemiya Masaki has the similar effect for the first dimension, but this corresponds to common knowledge of him being an extreme proponent of anti-territorial (``moyo'') style. -\item [4] We do not consider games of Go Seigen due to him playing across several distinct Go-playing eras and thus specifically high diversity of patterns. +\item [2] We consider era as one of factors when finding correlations with pattern vectors; we quantify era by taking median year over all games played by the player. Since this quantity does not fit to the table, we at least sort the players ascending by their median year. +\item [3] We do not consider games of Go Seigen due to him playing across several distinct Go-playing eras and thus specifically high diversity of patterns. +\item [4] We do not consider games of Ishida Yoshio and Yamashita Keigo for the PCA analysis since they are significant outliers, making high-order dimensions much like purely ``similarity to this player''. Takemiya Masaki has the similar effect for the first dimension, but this corresponds to common knowledge of him being an extreme proponent of anti-territorial (``moyo'') style. +\item [5] We consider games only up to year 2004, since Yi Ch'ang-ho was prominent representative of a balanced, careful player until then, but is regarded to have altered his style significantly afterwards. \end{tablenotes} \end{threeparttable} \end{table} -- 2.11.4.GIT