From 0e4a3810055135a4bbcf83e60998c6686ad6c7ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:03:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tex: PCA2 Patterns, extra footnotes

---
 tex/gostyle.tex | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tex/gostyle.tex b/tex/gostyle.tex
index ef3d8ec..2407874 100644
--- a/tex/gostyle.tex
+++ b/tex/gostyle.tex
@@ -982,14 +982,14 @@ Eigenval. & $\tau$ & $\omega$ & $\alpha$ & $\theta$ & Year \\
 % increase table row spacing, adjust to taste
 \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
 \begin{threeparttable}
-\caption{Characteristic Patterns of PCA Dimensions}
+\caption{Characteristic Patterns of PCA Dimensions \tnote{1}}
 \label{fig:style_patterns}
 \centering
 % Some packages, such as MDW tools, offer better commands for making tables
 % than the plain LaTeX2e tabular which is used here.
 \begin{tabular}{|cccc|}
 \hline
-PCA1 correl. \tnote{1} &
+PCA1 \tnote{2} &
 \begin{psgopartialboard*}{(8,1)(12,6)}
 \stone[\marktr]{black}{k}{4}
 \end{psgopartialboard*} &
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ PCA1 correl. \tnote{1} &
 \end{psgopartialboard*} \\
 $0.447 \cdot$ & $0.274$ & $0.086$ & $0.083$ \\
 & high corner/side opening & high corner approach & high distant pincer \\
-PCA1 anticor. \tnote{2} &
+PCA1 \tnote{3} &
 \begin{psgopartialboard*}{(3,1)(7,6)}
 \stone{white}{d}{4}
 \stone[\marktr]{black}{f}{3}
@@ -1019,11 +1019,33 @@ PCA1 anticor. \tnote{2} &
 \end{psgopartialboard*} \\
 $0.447 \cdot$ & $-0.399$ & $-0.399$ & $-0.177$ \\
 & low corner approach & low corner reply & low corner enclosure \\
+PCA2 \tnote{4} \tnote{5} &
+\begin{psgopartialboard*}{(3,1)(7,6)}
+\stone{white}{c}{6}
+\stone{black}{d}{4}
+\stone[\marktr]{black}{f}{3}
+\end{psgopartialboard*} &
+\begin{psgopartialboard*}{(3,1)(8,6)}
+\stone{white}{d}{4}
+\stone[\marktr]{black}{g}{4}
+\end{psgopartialboard*} &
+\begin{psgopartialboard*}{(4,1)(9,6)}
+\stone{black}{d}{4}
+\stone{white}{f}{3}
+\stone[\marktr]{black}{h}{3}
+\end{psgopartialboard*} \\
+$0.189 \cdot$ & $-0.193$ & $-0.139$ & $-0.135$ \\
+& low corner reply \tnote{6} & high distant approach/pincer & near low pincer \\
 \hline
 \end{tabular}
 \begin{tablenotes}
-\item [1] The more frequent the shape, the more moyo-oriented and thin-playing the player.
-\item [2] The more frequent the shape, the more territorial and thick-playing the player.
+\item [1] We present the patterns in a simplified compact form; in reality, they are usually somewhat larger and always circle-shaped (centered on the triangled move). We omit only pattern segments that are entirely empty.
+\item [2] The more frequent the shape, the more moyo-oriented and thin-playing the player.
+\item [3] The more frequent the shape, the more territorial and thick-playing the player.
+\item [4] The more frequent the shape, the more territorial and more current the player.
+\item [5] In the second PCA dimension, we find no correlated patterns;
+only uncorrelated and anti-correlated ones.
+\item [6] As the second most significant pattern, we skip a slide follow-up pattern to this move.
 \end{tablenotes}
 \end{threeparttable}
 \end{table}
-- 
2.11.4.GIT