| commit | d45cc6e2670bbfecb16c608a2bb0e3f358a9ece7 | |
| author | Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> | |
| Sun, 20 May 2007 00:10:13 +0000 (20 02:10 +0200) | ||
| committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | |
| Fri, 25 May 2007 04:36:53 +0000 (24 21:36 -0700) | ||
| tree | 0bc0710ecaed87129eaf8dd9af0c07c972935c98 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 18bece43675ea0dc9022a7868865e02808b7af7f | commitdiff |
git-applymbox: Remove command
I believe noone uses git-applymbox, and noone definitely should, since it
is supposed to be completely superseded and everything by its younger
cousin git-am. The only known person in the universe to use it was Linus
and he declared some time ago that he will try to use git-am instead in his
famous dotest script.
The trouble is that git-applymbox existence creates confusing UI. I'm a bit
like a recycled newbie to the git porcelain and *I* was confused by
git-applymbox primitiveness until I've realized a while later that I'm of
course using the wrong command.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I believe noone uses git-applymbox, and noone definitely should, since it
is supposed to be completely superseded and everything by its younger
cousin git-am. The only known person in the universe to use it was Linus
and he declared some time ago that he will try to use git-am instead in his
famous dotest script.
The trouble is that git-applymbox existence creates confusing UI. I'm a bit
like a recycled newbie to the git porcelain and *I* was confused by
git-applymbox primitiveness until I've realized a while later that I'm of
course using the wrong command.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>