for_each_ref: load all loose refs before packed refs

for_each_ref: load all loose refs before packed refs

If we are iterating through the refs using for_each_ref (or
any of its sister functions), we can get into a race
condition with a simultaneous "pack-refs --prune" that looks
like this:

  0. We have a large number of loose refs, and a few packed
     refs. refs/heads/z/foo is loose, with no matching entry
     in the packed-refs file.

  1. Process A starts iterating through the refs. It loads
     the packed-refs file from disk, then starts lazily
     traversing through the loose ref directories.

  2. Process B, running "pack-refs --prune", writes out the
     new packed-refs file. It then deletes the newly packed
     refs, including refs/heads/z/foo.

  3. Meanwhile, process A has finally gotten to
     refs/heads/z (it traverses alphabetically). It
     descends, but finds nothing there.  It checks its
     cached view of the packed-refs file, but it does not
     mention anything in "refs/heads/z/" at all (it predates
     the new file written by B in step 2).

The traversal completes successfully without mentioning
refs/heads/z/foo at all (the name, of course, isn't
important; but the more refs you have and the farther down
the alphabetical list a ref is, the more likely it is to hit
the race). If refs/heads/z/foo did exist in the packed refs
file at state 0, we would see an entry for it, but it would
show whatever sha1 the ref had the last time it was packed
(which could be an arbitrarily long time ago).

This can be especially dangerous when process A is "git
prune", as it means our set of reachable tips will be
incomplete, and we may erroneously prune objects reachable
from that tip (the same thing can happen if "repack -ad" is
used, as it simply drops unreachable objects that are
packed).

This patch solves it by loading all of the loose refs for
our traversal into our in-memory cache, and then refreshing
the packed-refs cache. Because a pack-refs writer will
always put the new packed-refs file into place before
starting the prune, we know that any loose refs we fail to
see will either truly be missing, or will have already been
put in the packed-refs file by the time we refresh.

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>