From 266f687aa812535c3e396923f68702eb9d410bbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Glenn Morris Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:45:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Cross off some easy rmail stuff. --- admin/FOR-RELEASE | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/admin/FOR-RELEASE b/admin/FOR-RELEASE index 16cde09d46f..bf04816c059 100644 --- a/admin/FOR-RELEASE +++ b/admin/FOR-RELEASE @@ -74,17 +74,10 @@ for buffer/string positions. E.g. struct it, struct text_pos. ** These lisp files refer to rmail, and might need updating post-mbox. -mail/rmailout ; act on the following comment? +It seems that rmail-output-to-rmail-file can be replaced by rmail-output. - ;; When Rmail is really installed, if we delete or rename the old Rmail - ;; we should do likewise with this function. +mail/rmail-spam-filter.el: check it still (?) works - (defun rmail-output-to-r-mail-buffer (tembuf msg) - -mail/rmail-spam-filter.el: rmail-output-to-rmail-file was deleted - this file is modified in rmail-mbox-branch? - -dired-x.el ; doc-fix for dired-bind-vm? gnus/gnus-art.el gnus/gnus-util.el gnus/gnus.el @@ -94,8 +87,9 @@ mail/feedmail.el ; comments about mail-header-separator still valid? mail/metamail.el mail/sendmail.el mail/uce.el -mail/undigest.el -mail/unrmail.el ; this file is modified in rmail-mbox-branch? +mail/undigest.el ; seems totally dependent (?) on Babyl format, and has + received zero mbox-branch updates. Is it not needed now? +mail/unrmail.el ; rev 1.13.2.4 not synced from mbox branch - should it be? net/mairix.el org/org-rmail.el @@ -108,7 +102,6 @@ gnus/nnmail.el mail/sendmail.el mail/uce.el mail/undigest.el -mail/unrmail.el * DOCUMENTATION -- 2.11.4.GIT