| commit | 477b4c539a5c05a0ccdf11b68fdff78b2ebe56cb | |
| author | Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> | |
| Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:21:01 +0000 (22 16:21 +0100) | ||
| committer | Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> | |
| Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:33:45 +0000 (23 20:33 +0100) | ||
| tree | 8620bdf9d0cc316b0ec77259d27ec1d041fc0cf7 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | b4ad5d0a93e60e887bcda9819597954e72115272 | commitdiff |
AMD Fam10h: Don't write uninitialized data into ACPI
The goto statement skipped all the code that is necessary
to fill in the data structures that are read right after
the jump.
Since there doesn't seem to be useful data, why write these
ACPI objects in the first place?
Change-Id: I1d06c11a7a31517b81e54159355d5c27e3cc3735
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Found-by: Coverity Scan
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8507
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
The goto statement skipped all the code that is necessary
to fill in the data structures that are read right after
the jump.
Since there doesn't seem to be useful data, why write these
ACPI objects in the first place?
Change-Id: I1d06c11a7a31517b81e54159355d5c27e3cc3735
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Found-by: Coverity Scan
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8507
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
| src/cpu/amd/model_10xxx/powernow_acpi.c | diffblobblamehistory |