| commit | 1818733faa9af615bc1d9024dee10865aaf22da0 | |
| author | Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> | |
| Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:18:14 +0000 (7 08:18 +0100) | ||
| committer | Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> | |
| Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:48:11 +0000 (22 10:48 +0000) | ||
| tree | 9785ab9bddec3c7f6d8128ff4d4a5348913e0b10 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 7f8b0cd89c10621f456e3eebcd290d3946122d6d | commitdiff |
cpu/intel/smm: Drop em64t save state
This save state is just plainly wrong in many regards and em64t100
should be used.
Checked with a model 0x17 core2 CPU.
Change-Id: I4d89691e87c91dd12b34a44b74849b18b4ac5369
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36660
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
This save state is just plainly wrong in many regards and em64t100
should be used.
Checked with a model 0x17 core2 CPU.
Change-Id: I4d89691e87c91dd12b34a44b74849b18b4ac5369
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36660
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
| src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c | diffblobblamehistory | |
| src/include/cpu/intel/em64t100_save_state.h | diffblobblamehistory | |
| src/include/cpu/intel/em64t_save_state.h | [deleted file] | blobblamehistory |