From 4c0559f77470a3f3da2606d8d3a722aee390a112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 06:50:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em (mmix_after_allocation): Also check for presence of .MMIX.reg_contents.linker_allocated before early exit. --- ld/ChangeLog | 4 ++++ ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em | 15 ++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ld/ChangeLog b/ld/ChangeLog index 388ed75aa..e1c0df34e 100644 --- a/ld/ChangeLog +++ b/ld/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 2002-02-15 Hans-Peter Nilsson + * emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em (mmix_after_allocation): Also check + for presence of .MMIX.reg_contents.linker_allocated before early + exit. + * NEWS: Mention support for MMIX. 2002-02-15 Alan Modra diff --git a/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em b/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em index 3357d36e0..44223a89b 100644 --- a/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em +++ b/ld/emultempl/mmix-elfnmmo.em @@ -61,7 +61,20 @@ mmix_after_allocation () = bfd_get_section_by_name (output_bfd, MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME); bfd_signed_vma regvma; - /* If there's no register section, we don't need to do anything. */ + /* If there's no register section, we don't need to do anything. On the + other hand, if a non-standard linker-script without a mapping from + MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME is present, as in the ld + test "NOCROSSREFS 2", that section (1) will be orphaned; not inserted + in MMIX_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME and (2) we will not do the + necessary preparations for those relocations that caused it to be + created. We'll SEGV from the latter error. The former error in + separation will result in a non-working binary, but that's expected + when you play tricks with linker scripts. The "NOCROSSREFS 2" test + does not run the output so it does not matter there. */ + if (sec == NULL) + sec + = bfd_get_section_by_name (output_bfd, + MMIX_LD_ALLOCATED_REG_CONTENTS_SECTION_NAME); if (sec == NULL) return; -- 2.11.4.GIT