From 8ed62646c0f763378b6b9e52b32999c79c847ddf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Reuben Thomas Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:53:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix grammaros. * doc/automake.texi (Flag Variables Ordering, Per-Object Flags): Fix grammaros. Signed-off-by: Ralf Wildenhues --- ChangeLog | 5 +++++ doc/automake.texi | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index add56b2e4..48ee5a9fc 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2008-08-19 Reuben Thomas (tiny patch) + + * doc/automake.texi (Flag Variables Ordering, Per-Object Flags): + Fix grammaros. + 2008-08-02 Karl Berry * lib/gnupload: Provide also a simple example. diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi index 5cb5642dd..021c0aecd 100644 --- a/doc/automake.texi +++ b/doc/automake.texi @@ -10419,7 +10419,7 @@ DejaGnu tests (@pxref{Tests}) use @code{RUNTESTDEFAULTFLAGS} and (@pxref{Tags}) use @code{ETAGSFLAGS}, @code{AM_ETAGSFLAGS}, @code{CTAGSFLAGS}, and @code{AM_CTAGSFLAGS}. Java rules (@pxref{Java}) use @code{JAVACFLAGS} and @code{AM_JAVACFLAGS}. None -of these rules do support per-target flags (yet). +of these rules supports per-target flags (yet). To some extent, even @code{AM_MAKEFLAGS} (@pxref{Subdirectories}) obeys this naming scheme. The slight difference is that @@ -10516,7 +10516,7 @@ sources of the @emph{program} @code{foo}, it has nothing to do with @file{foo.c} or @file{foo-foo.o} specifically. What if @file{foo.c} needs to be compiled into @file{foo.o} using some -specific flags, that none of the other files require? Obviously +specific flags, that none of the other files requires? Obviously per-program flags are not directly applicable here. Something like per-object flags are expected, i.e., flags that would be used only when creating @file{foo-foo.o}. Automake does not support that, -- 2.11.4.GIT