| commit | f75f1d62339f0accb4e574645b1d265c75a01b5b | |
| author | Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de> | |
| Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:55:26 +0000 (7 13:55 +0200) | ||
| committer | Bjoern Jacke <bj@sernet.de> | |
| Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:10:01 +0000 (10 16:10 +0200) | ||
| tree | 2cfd205038c1244b94bf3dcf1bd1850bc917a8c6 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 046daccba59a14ea9bb3827a829529ab20d22656 | commitdiff |
s3: handle non-POSIX compliant Tru64, NetBSD and FreeBSD errno on O_NOFOLLOW symlink open calls
or should we leave the NetBSD and FreeBSD platforms just broken? Actually these
two *want* to have broken platforms as they use different errno's than POSIX
demands *interntionally*. The POSIX errno ELOOP for O_NOFOLLOW open calls on
symlinks is clear and unambiguous. See http://gnats.netbsd.org/43154 for the
interesting NetBSD discussion on that.
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jun 10 16:10:02 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
or should we leave the NetBSD and FreeBSD platforms just broken? Actually these
two *want* to have broken platforms as they use different errno's than POSIX
demands *interntionally*. The POSIX errno ELOOP for O_NOFOLLOW open calls on
symlinks is clear and unambiguous. See http://gnats.netbsd.org/43154 for the
interesting NetBSD discussion on that.
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jun 10 16:10:02 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
| source3/smbd/open.c | diffblobblamehistory |