| commit | c3fedee2a67966e4640b26dd084e75125e58f55c | |
| author | Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> | |
| Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:13:25 +0000 (10 23:13 +0000) | ||
| committer | Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> | |
| Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:57:10 +0000 (10 10:57 -0500) | ||
| tree | 0c1919f5331aa020555287ab21cdbe5dbf315d2e | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 46c94b2659fa1f9d7ce2b6fd798e3abb3c7760d8 | commitdiff |
r7474: A *foul* and *disgusting* hack to ensure that, at the very lowest
level, . and .. are the first two entries returned when reading a
directory. This also means we can't seek to these offsets, but we
will never be doing that anyway (as far as I can think). The reason
we have to do this is that the NT4 explorer will happily display a
folder marked ".." as a clickable folder (and probably would display
"." as a clickable folder too) if these are not in positions zero
and one of the returned file list. W2K seems to have fixed this but
there are too many older systems out there... Never mind, more for
the "Undocumented CIFS talk", coming to a CIFS2005 conference near
you soon.... :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 7b6e907922b7d98abe4430ea73712a9c6419ea08)
level, . and .. are the first two entries returned when reading a
directory. This also means we can't seek to these offsets, but we
will never be doing that anyway (as far as I can think). The reason
we have to do this is that the NT4 explorer will happily display a
folder marked ".." as a clickable folder (and probably would display
"." as a clickable folder too) if these are not in positions zero
and one of the returned file list. W2K seems to have fixed this but
there are too many older systems out there... Never mind, more for
the "Undocumented CIFS talk", coming to a CIFS2005 conference near
you soon.... :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 7b6e907922b7d98abe4430ea73712a9c6419ea08)
| source3/smbd/dir.c | diffblobblamehistory |