Use a separate tdb for mutexes
commit3e1ac6b997d9202101457299fb53462b830167d0
authorVolker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:08:29 +0000 (10 21:08 +0100)
committerKarolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:10:48 +0000 (18 12:10 +0100)
tree97acad8a9cd211f7b32d550d46e7cab8438a46d0
parent2c2bc51debe9792c60eb29d5d820c5159eafbdbe
Use a separate tdb for mutexes

Another preparation to convert secrets.c to dbwrap: The dbwrap API does not
provide a sane tdb_lock_with_timeout abstraction. In the clustered case the DC
mutex is needed per-node anyway, so it is perfectly fine to use a local mutex
only.
(cherry picked from commit f94a63cd8f94490780ad9331da229c0bcb2ca5d6)
source/auth/auth_domain.c
source/auth/auth_server.c
source/include/smb.h
source/lib/server_mutex.c
source/libads/kerberos_verify.c
source/passdb/secrets.c
source/winbindd/winbindd_cm.c