From d2ec925c63fdcfd102f7adcc345ce9f1fe886fd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:23:44 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix sequence number generation against OpenLDAP It seems that in 2deeb99fff1a90c79ba1927e1a069362e250a63c adding the partition control to this request was missed out. Andrew Bartlett Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c index 2a321e29c50..5500c75a928 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition.c @@ -895,6 +895,14 @@ static int partition_sequence_number(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_reque return ret; } + ret = ldb_request_add_control(treq, + DSDB_CONTROL_CURRENT_PARTITION_OID, + false, data->partitions[i]); + if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { + talloc_free(res); + return ret; + } + ret = partition_request(data->partitions[i]->module, treq); if (ret != LDB_SUCCESS) { talloc_free(res); -- 2.11.4.GIT