From 60a8ba4a6b028d516b39de2f55c68a6e8cbbf43f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volker Lendecke Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:34:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] password_hash: Fix the build on FreeBSD This ditches a particular aspect of thread safety, but I doubt that ldb is really thread safe. So in practice, I think we should not see harm from this. Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 13 05:06:49 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144 --- source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c index 8e8dc2c3072..68028f0fce4 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c @@ -1543,13 +1543,12 @@ static int setup_primary_userPassword_hash( hash = crypt((char *)io->n.cleartext_utf8->data, cmd); #endif if (hash == NULL) { - char buf[1024]; ldb_asprintf_errstring( ldb, "setup_primary_userPassword: generation of a %s " "password hash failed: (%s)", scheme, - strerror_r(errno, buf, sizeof(buf))); + strerror(errno)); TALLOC_FREE(frame); return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR; } -- 2.11.4.GIT