From 1061a9cafda7d73ebcd2f74e69e74f4adc485d5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volker Lendecke Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 13:13:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] tdb: Fix bug 11381, deadlock This fixes a deadlock in tdb that is a bad interaction between tdb_lockall and tdb_traverse. This deadlock condition has been around even before tdb mutexes, it's just that the kernel fcntl EDEADLK detection protected us from this ABBA lock condition to become a real deadlock stalling processes. With tdb mutexes, this deadlock protection is gone, so we do lock dead. This patch glosses over this particular ABBA condition, making tdb with mutexes behave the same as tdb without mutexes. Admittedly this is no real fix, but it works around a real user's problem. Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11381 Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison --- lib/tdb/common/traverse.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/tdb/common/traverse.c b/lib/tdb/common/traverse.c index 618670fd1cb..e18e3c34fd3 100644 --- a/lib/tdb/common/traverse.c +++ b/lib/tdb/common/traverse.c @@ -245,13 +245,25 @@ _PUBLIC_ int tdb_traverse(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data) { struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0, F_WRLCK }; + enum tdb_lock_flags lock_flags; int ret; if (tdb->read_only || tdb->traverse_read) { return tdb_traverse_read(tdb, fn, private_data); } - if (tdb_transaction_lock(tdb, F_WRLCK, TDB_LOCK_WAIT)) { + lock_flags = TDB_LOCK_WAIT; + + if (tdb->allrecord_lock.count != 0) { + /* + * This avoids a deadlock between tdb_lockall() and + * tdb_traverse(). See + * https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11381 + */ + lock_flags = TDB_LOCK_NOWAIT; + } + + if (tdb_transaction_lock(tdb, F_WRLCK, lock_flags)) { return -1; } -- 2.11.4.GIT