| commit | 7649652b636fcc6997377a94ee7b4bc8fec4ffbb | |
| author | Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz> | |
| Wed, 27 Sep 2017 03:23:29 +0000 (27 16:23 +1300) | ||
| committer | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |
| Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:05:21 +0000 (20 04:05 +0200) | ||
| tree | f70b5583aab4b9c5017c7c805fccb3d3a6438c60 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | f183dcfad56c7eb9b188dcfbf4d4b7a2598ef08c | commitdiff |
replmd: Use replmd_set_la_val() when adding new links
replmd_set_la_val() and replmd_build_la_val() are almost identical. When
we were processing the replicated link attributes we were calling one
function if the link was new, and a different one if the link existed.
I think we should be able to get away with using replmd_set_la_val() in
both cases.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13055
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
replmd_set_la_val() and replmd_build_la_val() are almost identical. When
we were processing the replicated link attributes we were calling one
function if the link was new, and a different one if the link existed.
I think we should be able to get away with using replmd_set_la_val() in
both cases.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13055
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
| source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c | diffblobblamehistory |