| commit | 71c6da46eee4acc245bd326865f84336f457f538 | |
| author | Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org> | |
| Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:08:35 +0000 (25 16:08 +0200) | ||
| committer | Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> | |
| Tue, 6 Aug 2019 21:49:29 +0000 (6 21:49 +0000) | ||
| tree | 93d8103fcb06195b5a21c3741a0c72a6be218be7 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 41ab2b8ec5d398ef6187562c7620c359837f3899 | commitdiff |
smbd: Pass share_access/access_mask explicitly to grant_fsp_oplock_type()
Why? While restructuring open_file_ntcreate() I found the data flow for
these values confusing: grant_fsp_oplock_type() depends on
fsp->access_mask, which changes its value inside
open_file_ntcreate(). I find the data flow easier to follow if it
happens in explicit variables.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Why? While restructuring open_file_ntcreate() I found the data flow for
these values confusing: grant_fsp_oplock_type() depends on
fsp->access_mask, which changes its value inside
open_file_ntcreate(). I find the data flow easier to follow if it
happens in explicit variables.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
| source3/smbd/open.c | diffblobblamehistory |