| commit | 44d5f5ec6db76c981f94e7322f82592e5d85be9f | |
| author | Derrell Lipman <derrell@samba.org> | |
| Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:58:05 +0000 (13 02:58 +0000) | ||
| committer | Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> | |
| Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:49:30 +0000 (10 14:49 -0500) | ||
| tree | 3873ca6841af1e574ac347ab48cb498fdb094a5b | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | ab620c9554642f1289d6d0136fb104e475f22316 | commitdiff |
r21810: - The height of a widget is in relation to its enclosing widget. Specifying a
height of 100% means that if the enclosing widget is 100 pixels high, this
widget should be 100 pixels high. If this widget is then placed someplace
other than at the top of the enclosing widget, e.g. with top:20, the bottom
of this widget will fall off the bottom of the enclosing widget.
The normal way to solve this is to specify top and bottom attributes rather
than top and height attributes. Also, since widgets often look better if
they don't extend all the way to the very bottom, specifying a bottom
attribute equal to the top attribute typically has an appealing appearance.
I've fixed the tree widget so it no longer falls off the bottom of the page.
height of 100% means that if the enclosing widget is 100 pixels high, this
widget should be 100 pixels high. If this widget is then placed someplace
other than at the top of the enclosing widget, e.g. with top:20, the bottom
of this widget will fall off the bottom of the enclosing widget.
The normal way to solve this is to specify top and bottom attributes rather
than top and height attributes. Also, since widgets often look better if
they don't extend all the way to the very bottom, specifying a bottom
attribute equal to the top attribute typically has an appealing appearance.
I've fixed the tree widget so it no longer falls off the bottom of the page.
| webapps/swat/source/class/swat/module/netmgr/Gui.js | diffblobblamehistory |