| commit | 21bf6af2236bd2c12c979dad971600350f327989 | |
| author | Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |
| Tue, 22 Dec 2015 06:33:39 +0000 (22 19:33 +1300) | ||
| committer | Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org> | |
| Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:29:35 +0000 (15 20:29 +0100) | ||
| tree | b0b9628b6d77de70a46b52d35d24a93b58ae7132 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | d3bffda2f2b03f2064bbea6c9de09aa3f2fbfd55 | commitdiff |
repl_meta_data: Correctly use msDS-IntId for custom schema, not the prefixMap value
We must, when dealing with custom schema, respect the msDC-IntId value recorded
in the schema. If we do not, then we will create multiple replPropertyMetaData
records for the one attribute. This may cause confusion during replication.
This fixes the issue by always calling dsdb_attribute_get_attid() to obtain
the correct local (32 bit integer) attribute ID
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11443
(cherry picked from commit ecf0dd49e07e2c7fad5adf0a82abbc3e301a4e5a)
We must, when dealing with custom schema, respect the msDC-IntId value recorded
in the schema. If we do not, then we will create multiple replPropertyMetaData
records for the one attribute. This may cause confusion during replication.
This fixes the issue by always calling dsdb_attribute_get_attid() to obtain
the correct local (32 bit integer) attribute ID
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11443
(cherry picked from commit ecf0dd49e07e2c7fad5adf0a82abbc3e301a4e5a)
| source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c | diffblobblamehistory | |
| source4/dsdb/tests/python/ldap_schema.py | diffblobblamehistory |