| commit | aa5c6d127559912ad60a63fbd972b78fb8f9691b | |
| author | Vasily Melenchuk <vasily.melenchuk@cib.de> | |
| Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:27:56 +0000 (14 14:27 +0300) | ||
| committer | Thorsten Behrens <thorsten.behrens@allotropia.de> | |
| Mon, 28 Jun 2021 22:48:36 +0000 (29 00:48 +0200) | ||
| tree | f58857a341fa8930ad173e82e5c11a5fedf294e0 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 99ef46fdb2a975e074c66a02328b86edfc05307f | commitdiff |
new ODF numbered list parameter loext:num-list-format
Instead of style:num-prefix and style:num-suffix new list format
is much more flexible for storing list multilevel numberings.
Now it is possible to have not just prefix/suffix but any random
separators between levels, arbitrary levels order, etc.
Internal LO format for list format is changed: instead of placeholders
like %1, %2, etc we right now use %1%, %2%... Reason: for ODT documents,
having more than 9 levels there is ambiguity in "%10": it is "%1"
followed by "0" suffix, or "%10"?
Aux changes:
* removed zero width space hack: since format string is always defined
this hack is interfering with standard list numbers printing
(see changes in ooxmlexport14.cxx, ww8export3.cxx tests)
* changed cross-references values to lists: they are now including full
list label string: previously this was bit self-contradictory (see
changes in odfexport.cxx and check_cross_references.py tests)
Change-Id: I9696cc4846375c5f6222539aeaadbca5ae58ce27
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/117156
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
Instead of style:num-prefix and style:num-suffix new list format
is much more flexible for storing list multilevel numberings.
Now it is possible to have not just prefix/suffix but any random
separators between levels, arbitrary levels order, etc.
Internal LO format for list format is changed: instead of placeholders
like %1, %2, etc we right now use %1%, %2%... Reason: for ODT documents,
having more than 9 levels there is ambiguity in "%10": it is "%1"
followed by "0" suffix, or "%10"?
Aux changes:
* removed zero width space hack: since format string is always defined
this hack is interfering with standard list numbers printing
(see changes in ooxmlexport14.cxx, ww8export3.cxx tests)
* changed cross-references values to lists: they are now including full
list label string: previously this was bit self-contradictory (see
changes in odfexport.cxx and check_cross_references.py tests)
Change-Id: I9696cc4846375c5f6222539aeaadbca5ae58ce27
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/117156
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
26 files changed: