| commit | 6ba3c85aad33ad3eded935185686dfcaaa7fcaa8 | |
| author | Justin Luth <justin.luth@collabora.com> | |
| Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:13:01 +0000 (15 21:13 +0200) | ||
| committer | Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com> | |
| Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:36:18 +0000 (17 06:36 +0100) | ||
| tree | 367d9d8da75cb0d5b90f03d9ba070daea8c4cab0 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 94016b435404f19d84ed636c5b3fd1ab0c02e020 | commitdiff |
tdf#119298 sw: keep automatic position on trivial width change
The issue here was that simply moving the border around
(which shouldn't change the table size at all)
triggered a miniscule difference in reported table width.
Well, that is not enough reason to change away from automatic
positioning now is it?
Change-Id: Ib40c50a1069d88fa22f4791366eb0a50b4e9b11d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131633
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com>
The issue here was that simply moving the border around
(which shouldn't change the table size at all)
triggered a miniscule difference in reported table width.
Well, that is not enough reason to change away from automatic
positioning now is it?
Change-Id: Ib40c50a1069d88fa22f4791366eb0a50b4e9b11d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131633
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com>
| sw/source/core/table/swtable.cxx | diffblobblamehistory |