From 9f5ce273e9fd73d877722e6c995ade5c6929d256 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Hilvert Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:46:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] bugs: propose qualifier for wrapper-assigned EV, and also parallel auto/manual exposure alignment. --- bugs/issue-cab7325d15520590f791a0e9fd93cbbcf5c9434d.yaml | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/bugs/issue-cab7325d15520590f791a0e9fd93cbbcf5c9434d.yaml b/bugs/issue-cab7325d15520590f791a0e9fd93cbbcf5c9434d.yaml index 561e4da..0a8ac2b 100644 --- a/bugs/issue-cab7325d15520590f791a0e9fd93cbbcf5c9434d.yaml +++ b/bugs/issue-cab7325d15520590f791a0e9fd93cbbcf5c9434d.yaml @@ -16,4 +16,17 @@ log_events: - David Hilvert - created - "" +- - 2009-03-29 23:46:56.060560 Z + - David Hilvert + - commented + - |- + Consider that a qualifier (e.g., -) might be added as a suffix to --ev added by + the wrapper script, so that these can be ignored in certain circumstances + (e.g., by default for initial exposure settings, or for exposure settings under + a new --exp-user-meta, or so, option). + + As another possibility, if OpenCL-enabled alignment is sufficiently fast, + alignments beginning with specified EV might by default be accompanied by + alignment with automatic EV, with final alignment determined by match + values after the final exposure adjustment occurs. git_branch: -- 2.11.4.GIT