sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
commitfde939495571ffd22458e94745b0c2e6af33478d
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:05:22 +0000 (14 10:05 -0800)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:14:02 +0000 (6 14:14 -0800)
treecea44545aaf882a8445c5fe9bf2d9a9e9c385ea0
parent747b409502fe765784cda1135d806042beddaa89
sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.

[ Upstream commit b1f44e13a525d2ffb7d5afe2273b7169d6f2222e ]

The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c