From: Bert Hubert Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:33:38 +0000 (+0000) Subject: wrodk X-Git-Url: https://repo.or.cz/w/lartc.git/commitdiff_plain/273e442fef7482265d40ea72ec829d8c452d48b2 wrodk --- diff --git a/lartc.db b/lartc.db index da7d858..fc15bd7 100644 --- a/lartc.db +++ b/lartc.db @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ speaker. Feel free to send suggestions. -If you feel to you are better qualified to maintain a section, or think that +If you feel you are better qualified to maintain a section, or think that you can author and maintain new sections, you are welcome to do so. The SGML of this HOWTO is available via CVS, I very much envision more people working on it. @@ -2419,6 +2419,28 @@ try.". + + Check Point VPN-1 +NG + + Peter Bieringer reports: + +Here are some results (tunnel mode only tested, auth=SHA1): + +DES: ok +3DES: ok +AES-128: ok +AES-192: not supported by CP VPN-1 +AES-256: ok +CAST* : not supported by used Linux kernel + +Tested version: FP4 aka R54 aka w/AI + + + + More information here. + @@ -2964,7 +2986,7 @@ our waits so we send just at peakrate. -However, due to de default 10ms timer resolution of Unix, with 10.000 bits +However, due to the default 10ms timer resolution of Unix, with 10.000 bits average packets, we are limited to 1mbit/s of peakrate! @@ -9583,7 +9605,8 @@ to the configuration language in Zebra :-) Cpu intensive - OSPF is based on Dijkstra's Shortest Path First algorithm, which is expensive compared to other routing algorithms. But really is not that bad, since the Shortest Path is only calculed for each area, also for small to medium sized networks this won't be an issue, and you won't even notice. + OSPF is based on Dijkstra's Shortest Path First algorithm, which is expensive compared to other routing algorithms. But really is not that bad, since the Shortest Path is only +calculated for each area, also for small to medium sized networks this won't be an issue, and you won't even notice. @@ -10139,6 +10162,9 @@ Redundancy Protocol implementation ( ) +FIXME: This link died, anybody know where it went? + + This is purely for redundancy. Two machines with their own IP address and MAC Address together create a third IP Address and MAC Address, which is virtual. Originally intended purely for routers, which need constant MAC @@ -10399,6 +10425,22 @@ helping. + + + Peter + Bieringer +
pb:bieringer.de
+
+
+ + + + Adam + Burke +
aburke%crg.ee.uct.ac.za
+
+
+ @@ -10573,12 +10615,22 @@ helping.
koos@kzdoos.xs4all.nl
+ Stefan Huelbrock <shuelbrock%datasystems.de> + + + + AyotundeItayemi +
aitayemi:metrong.com
+
+
+ + @@ -10668,7 +10720,6 @@ Edmund Lau <edlau%ucf.ics.uci.edu> Philippe Latu <philippe.latu%linux-france.org> - Arthur van Leeuwen <arthurvl%sci.kun.nl> @@ -10683,13 +10734,15 @@ Arthur van Leeuwen <arthurvl%sci.kun.nl> - - -RobertLowe - -
robert.h.lowe@lawrence.edu
-
-
+ + + + RobertLowe + +
robert.h.lowe@lawrence.edu
+
+
+ @@ -10916,6 +10969,10 @@ Jason Tackaberry <tack@linux.com> Charles Tassell <ctassell%isn.net> + + +Jason Thomas <jason5intology.com.au> +