| commit | 63a945adabd5fc7267334917329d1f2100b3334f | |
| author | Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> | |
| Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:17:51 +0000 (24 02:17 -0700) | ||
| committer | Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> | |
| Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:17:51 +0000 (24 02:17 -0700) | ||
| tree | 4cc9c56574ec21d8fb51cbb22cb9090fca3d3190 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 86a5b5a475277e570451d0f6210cd31099cf1d0b | commitdiff |
topgit_msg: expose bare branches
Instead of annotating bare branches with "(missing .topmsg)"
(which they are) annotate them more correctly with "(bare branch)"
instead. It's a bit more friendly and more accurate and looks
a little bit less like an error. And truthfully "bare branches"
are tolerated just a bit more than only "missing .topmsg" branches.
Therefore the change makes sense from that perspective and it does
provide more information than the old annotation.
Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Instead of annotating bare branches with "(missing .topmsg)"
(which they are) annotate them more correctly with "(bare branch)"
instead. It's a bit more friendly and more accurate and looks
a little bit less like an error. And truthfully "bare branches"
are tolerated just a bit more than only "missing .topmsg" branches.
Therefore the change makes sense from that perspective and it does
provide more information than the old annotation.
Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>