| commit | 4d2750e571b6a3f700cd95542a4bb5c7949e476c | |
| author | David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> | |
| Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:40:37 +0000 (27 18:40 -0800) | ||
| committer | David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> | |
| Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:40:37 +0000 (27 18:40 -0800) | ||
| tree | 8d9128f2ab5fb8281526baa6d7c9a168875e4f89 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | 77aa7ca8d65ac5dc7b46ad9ef79e3f6aed9b4d0e | commitdiff |
ARM11: write_memory() avoids increment check
When writing to a chip's "reset yourself" register, the ARM11 code
was reporting a spurious failure. Just don't bother checking for
correctly incremented pointers given single-unit writes ... it's
a bit faster that way too. (Reads should likely do the same thing.
For that matter, such checks are usually just a waste...)
Shrink an overlong parameter name, and associated lines'o'code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
When writing to a chip's "reset yourself" register, the ARM11 code
was reporting a spurious failure. Just don't bother checking for
correctly incremented pointers given single-unit writes ... it's
a bit faster that way too. (Reads should likely do the same thing.
For that matter, such checks are usually just a waste...)
Shrink an overlong parameter name, and associated lines'o'code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
| src/target/arm11.c | diffblobblamehistory |