From 5ff39dc78d06991d4161698cfbd7b6084af4fb37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:26:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] stdscan.c: clarify comment

There is a reason rn_warn isn't checked in this particular case...
---
 stdscan.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/stdscan.c b/stdscan.c
index 8295054a..30269e47 100644
--- a/stdscan.c
+++ b/stdscan.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ int stdscan(void *private_data, struct tokenval *tv)
             return tv->t_type = TOKEN_ERRNUM;   /* unmatched quotes */
         stdscan_bufptr++;       /* skip over final quote */
         tv->t_integer = readstrnum(r, tv->t_inttwo, &rn_warn);
-        /* FIXME: rn_warn is not checked! */
+        /* rn_warn is not checked on purpose; it might not be a valid number */
         return tv->t_type = TOKEN_NUM;
     } else if (*stdscan_bufptr == ';') {        /* a comment has happened - stay */
         return tv->t_type = 0;
-- 
2.11.4.GIT