| commit | 4d479cf010d56ec9c54f3099992d039918f1296b | |
| author | Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> | |
| Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:34:31 +0000 (17 11:34 -0500) | ||
| committer | Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> | |
| Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:42:17 +0000 (20 07:42 -0500) | ||
| tree | efed635e7dc1d53c9a63787846912df1667e8a16 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | f7d61dcd6873c49bcc42be2caa2af1c2511aa915 | commitdiff |
Btrfs: sectorsize align offsets in fiemap
We've been hitting BUG()'s in btrfs_cont_expand and btrfs_fallocate and anywhere
else that calls btrfs_get_extent while running xfstests 13 in a loop. This is
because fiemap is calling btrfs_get_extent with non-sectorsize aligned offsets,
which will end up adding mappings that are not sectorsize aligned, which will
cause problems in some cases for subsequent calls to btrfs_get_extent for
similar areas that are sectorsize aligned. With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in
a loop for a couple of hours and didn't hit the problem that I could previously
hit in at most 20 minutes. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
We've been hitting BUG()'s in btrfs_cont_expand and btrfs_fallocate and anywhere
else that calls btrfs_get_extent while running xfstests 13 in a loop. This is
because fiemap is calling btrfs_get_extent with non-sectorsize aligned offsets,
which will end up adding mappings that are not sectorsize aligned, which will
cause problems in some cases for subsequent calls to btrfs_get_extent for
similar areas that are sectorsize aligned. With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in
a loop for a couple of hours and didn't hit the problem that I could previously
hit in at most 20 minutes. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
| fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | diffblobblamehistory |