| commit | d0d34e6719ac92b22988078823deeccdaee91be6 | |
| author | Gary King <gwking@franz.com> | |
| Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:37:33 +0000 (6 15:37 -0500) | ||
| committer | Gary King <gwking@franz.com> | |
| Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:37:33 +0000 (6 15:37 -0500) | ||
| tree | b15bfbf41c92acb223e2b5c9fff7032d55a8b6c2 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | f83862c8b418ce80928148f5a783768cf3e271da | commitdiff |
finish move of sub-suites to run to outer loop and initform changes
Combined this means that
* slot-initforms are evaluated only once (previously it was
every time) and are effectively test-suite setup rather
than test-case setup.
* dynamic variables happen after initforms rather than before
* since we determine all the tests we're going to run
up-front, the counts of skipped test-suites changes.
* since an error may occur during test-suite creation, we
cannot rely on the test-suite being there during error
reporting so we move both testsuite-initargs and
current-step from the suite to the result.
* several bits in test-running can be simplified from methods
into defuns (yeah!)
Combined this means that
* slot-initforms are evaluated only once (previously it was
every time) and are effectively test-suite setup rather
than test-case setup.
* dynamic variables happen after initforms rather than before
* since we determine all the tests we're going to run
up-front, the counts of skipped test-suites changes.
* since an error may occur during test-suite creation, we
cannot rely on the test-suite being there during error
reporting so we move both testsuite-initargs and
current-step from the suite to the result.
* several bits in test-running can be simplified from methods
into defuns (yeah!)