| commit | 1ebd72126a5ae100109581595ffae57bb5518987 | |
| author | gevaerts <gevaerts@a1c6a512-1295-4272-9138-f99709370657> | |
| Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:33:53 +0000 (25 22:33 +0000) | ||
| committer | gevaerts <gevaerts@a1c6a512-1295-4272-9138-f99709370657> | |
| Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:33:53 +0000 (25 22:33 +0000) | ||
| tree | 4009b1e85ca9026980882262b7aff6c636428a49 | treesnapshot (tar.gz zip) |
| parent | fb1e64b31b02e6f3b7634f11b33fd64c03113f92 | commitdiff |
don't start waiting for the new command in send_csw(). Although on the USB level this is entirely correct, and about 10% to 15% faster, usb_storage_transfer_complete() could get slightly confused by this.
The proper fix is obviously to make usb_storage_transfer_complete() not get confused, but that's a lot more work, and I prefer things to be correct to them being a bit faster right now
git-svn-id: svn://svn.rockbox.org/rockbox/trunk@24333 a1c6a512-1295-4272-9138-f99709370657
The proper fix is obviously to make usb_storage_transfer_complete() not get confused, but that's a lot more work, and I prefer things to be correct to them being a bit faster right now
git-svn-id: svn://svn.rockbox.org/rockbox/trunk@24333 a1c6a512-1295-4272-9138-f99709370657
| firmware/usbstack/usb_storage.c | diffblobblamehistory |