Parallel vs. sequentiual code: I get binary identical result (apart from comment...

Parallel vs. sequentiual code:    I get binary identical result (apart from comment strings) in the xvg- and ndx outputs. I get the same number of hbonds/distances. The ACF differs insignificantly (due to the adding of reals in an unpredictable order). The only difference as I can see is the -don output, which is random anyway. The one thing left is the parallelization of the Luzar/Chandler ACF calculation. And two bugzillas :-).

Erik Makrlund