From: Jim Meyering Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:45:18 +0000 (-0700) Subject: intprops.h, xalloc-oversized.h: work with gcc 7 X-Git-Url: https://repo.or.cz/gnulib/ericb.git/commitdiff_plain/175b4e22f99e00996b72f822f5ae54dca8243d19 intprops.h, xalloc-oversized.h: work with gcc 7 In gcc 6, __builtin_add_overflow, __builtin_sub_overflow and __builtin_mul_overflow each accept a NULL pointer as the third argument. However in gcc 7, that is no longer accepted. Instead, one must use the "_p"-suffixed names, with which, the third parameter is no longer a pointer. * lib/intprops.h (_GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_WITH_NULL): Correct the definition: not true for gcc 7 and subsequent. (_GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P): Define. (_GL_ADD_OVERFLOW, _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW, _GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW): Provide new definitions for gcc 7 and subsequent. * lib/xalloc-oversized.h (xalloc_oversized): Provide a definition that works with gcc-7. --- diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index c5e6ee879b..8e7ab74757 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,19 @@ 2016-08-29 Jim Meyering + intprops.h, xalloc-oversized.h: work with gcc 7 + In gcc 6, __builtin_add_overflow, __builtin_sub_overflow and + __builtin_mul_overflow each accept a NULL pointer as the third + argument. However in gcc 7, that is no longer accepted. + Instead, one must use the "_p"-suffixed names, with which, the + third parameter is no longer a pointer. + * lib/intprops.h (_GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_WITH_NULL): Correct + the definition: not true for gcc 7 and subsequent. + (_GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P): Define. + (_GL_ADD_OVERFLOW, _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW, _GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW): + Provide new definitions for gcc 7 and subsequent. + * lib/xalloc-oversized.h (xalloc_oversized): Provide a definition + that works with gcc-7. + intprops.h: fix missing-backslash problems * lib/intprops.h (_GL_ADD_OVERFLOW): Add backslash. (_GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW,_GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW): Likewise. diff --git a/lib/intprops.h b/lib/intprops.h index 0c45550a9b..d2a65cc5e4 100644 --- a/lib/intprops.h +++ b/lib/intprops.h @@ -229,13 +229,23 @@ verify (TYPE_MAXIMUM (long long int) == LLONG_MAX); : (max) >> (b) < (a)) /* True if __builtin_add_overflow (A, B, P) works when P is null. */ -#define _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_WITH_NULL (7 <= __GNUC__) +#define _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_WITH_NULL (6 == __GNUC__) + +/* True if __builtin_add_overflow_p (A, B, C) works. */ +#define _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P (7 <= __GNUC__) /* The _GL*_OVERFLOW macros have the same restrictions as the *_RANGE_OVERFLOW macros, except that they do not assume that operands (e.g., A and B) have the same type as MIN and MAX. Instead, they assume that the result (e.g., A + B) has that type. */ -#if _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_WITH_NULL +#if _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P +# define _GL_ADD_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max) \ + __builtin_add_overflow_p (a, b, (a) + (b)) +# define _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max) \ + __builtin_sub_overflow_p (a, b, (a) - (b)) +# define _GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max) \ + __builtin_mul_overflow_p (a, b, (a) * (b)) +#elif _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_WITH_NULL # define _GL_ADD_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max) \ __builtin_add_overflow (a, b, (__typeof__ ((a) + (b)) *) 0) # define _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max) \ diff --git a/lib/xalloc-oversized.h b/lib/xalloc-oversized.h index 44f16441c7..9954f50336 100644 --- a/lib/xalloc-oversized.h +++ b/lib/xalloc-oversized.h @@ -43,9 +43,12 @@ nonnegative. This is a macro, not a function, so that it works correctly even when SIZE_MAX < N. */ -/* GCC 7 __builtin_mul_overflow should easily compute this. See: - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68120 */ #if 7 <= __GNUC__ +# define xalloc_oversized(n, s) __builtin_mul_overflow_p (n, s, (size_t) 1) + +/* GCC 6 __builtin_mul_overflow should easily compute this. See: + https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68120 */ +#elif 6 == __GNUC__ # define xalloc_oversized(n, s) __builtin_mul_overflow (n, s, (size_t *) NULL) /* GCC 5 and Clang __builtin_mul_overflow needs a temporary, and